#7496: symbolic variable names should be valid identifiers, or ridiculousness
follows
-----------------------------------+----------------------------------------
Reporter: was | Owner: burcin
Type: defect | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-4.7.1
Component: symbolics | Keywords: sd31
Work_issues: | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: Karl-Dieter Crisman | Author: Volker Braun
Merged: | Dependencies:
-----------------------------------+----------------------------------------
Changes (by kcrisman):
* reviewer: => Karl-Dieter Crisman
Comment:
This code should be correct - nice to learn something about the parser and
bytecode. Is this how it's implemented in Python 3 (presumably that's
written in C, though)? I couldn't find it, anyway.
This needs doctests just to document that `var('3')` and `var(' ')` (see
#9724) fail, though of course the tests already here document this
indirectly. I'll post a reviewer patch momentarily, assuming I didn't
miss something and the patch doesn't actually work.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7496#comment:6>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.