#11363: Update setuptools to a newer version
--------------------------------+-------------------------------------------
    Reporter:  fbissey          |         Owner:  tbd              
        Type:  task             |        Status:  closed           
    Priority:  major            |     Milestone:  sage-4.7.1       
   Component:  packages         |    Resolution:  fixed            
    Keywords:                   |   Work_issues:                   
    Upstream:  N/A              |      Reviewer:  Mariah Lenox     
      Author:  François Bissey  |        Merged:  sage-4.7.1.alpha3
Dependencies:                   |  
--------------------------------+-------------------------------------------

Comment(by leif):

 Replying to [comment:20 fbissey]:
 > You are quite right leif and I probably could have done a better job.

 Well, there are reviewers, too, and in fact some people who commented here
 were aware of that ticket.

 [[BR]]

 > My only defense is I absolutely hate searching on trac. It takes ages
 and most of the results are not that relevant.

 Yes, especially if you're searching for things like R... 8-)

 [[BR]]

 > I am not sure I understand your last comment. The posted patch
 summarizes the changes to the spkg and is not meant to be applied, just to
 give you a quick look at the changes. It seems to be a common enough
 practice.

 Not really relevant here, but even patches / diffs just for reference
 should IMHO be up-to-date. I just stumbled upon
 {{{
 #!diff
 --- setup.py    2007-09-04 19:18:46.000000000 +0300
 +++ setup.py    2007-11-04 09:49:18.000000000 +0200
 @@ -26,7 +26,6 @@
      url = "http://pypi.python.org/pypi/setuptools";,
      test_suite = 'setuptools.tests',
      packages = find_packages(),
 -    package_data = {'setuptools':['*.exe']},

      py_modules = ['pkg_resources', 'easy_install', 'site'],
 }}}
 which definitely belongs to an earlier version of the spkg. (Note the
 `url` in the context.)

 If someone is lazy (like me), he might review (more or less) just the spkg
 diff on trac as is, assuming it reflects the current state of the spkg,
 such that mistakes or unintended changes made later may sneak in.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/11363#comment:21>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to