#9555: Series expansions at singularities don't work
---------------------------------+------------------------------------------
Reporter: fredrik.johansson | Owner: burcin
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone:
Component: symbolics | Keywords:
Work_issues: | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: | Author:
Merged: | Dependencies:
---------------------------------+------------------------------------------
Comment(by kcrisman):
> > That said, `SR.taylor()` should probably be calling Pynac at this
point, probably just the `.series()` method (without Puiseaux). I agree
that the code itself is cruft, just not the name :)
>
> This would work, given the current behavior of Pynac/GiNaC's `series()`
function. It would cause problems in the future if that ever changes. We
should also add some doctests to make sure it only returns Taylor
expansions.
Well, I would envision it would have a special keyword that would require
returning only Taylor series. Presumably `.series()` should also have
this, don't you think? Even if that weren't the default behavior.
> This can also be done as a part of #6119. Then, instead of a deprecation
message we give an error pointing to the `.series()` method.
Sounds good.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9555#comment:9>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.