#11334: Update numpy to 1.6
------------------------+---------------------------------------------------
Reporter: jason | Owner: tbd
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-4.7.1
Component: packages | Keywords:
Work_issues: | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: | Author:
Merged: | Dependencies:
------------------------+---------------------------------------------------
Comment(by kcrisman):
Okay, I got pretty much the same failures on a long run. One weird
thing... did we change `find_minimum_on_interval` away from !SciPy
recently? This is the full output I get on the (otherwise same as your
failure) test for that.
{{{
sage: find_minimum_on_interval(f, 1, 5, tol=1e-3)
Expected:
(-3.28837136189098..., 3.42575079030572...)
Got:
(-3.28837136189, 3.4257507903057229)
GLPK Simplex Optimizer, v4.44
6 rows, 3 columns, 8 non-zeros
Preprocessing...
2 rows, 2 columns, 4 non-zeros
Scaling...
A: min|aij| = 2.400e+01 max|aij| = 5.000e+01 ratio = 2.083e+00
GM: min|aij| = 8.128e-01 max|aij| = 1.230e+00 ratio = 1.514e+00
EQ: min|aij| = 6.606e-01 max|aij| = 1.000e+00 ratio = 1.514e+00
Constructing initial basis...
Size of triangular part = 2
* 0: obj = -5.100000000e+01 infeas = 0.000e+00 (0)
* 1: obj = -5.225000000e+01 infeas = 0.000e+00 (0)
OPTIMAL SOLUTION FOUND
}}}
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/11334#comment:10>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
