#6670: Port group algebras to the current coercion system
------------------------------------------+---------------------------------
Reporter: mraum | Owner: mraum
Type: enhancement | Status: positive_review
Priority: minor | Milestone: sage-4.7.2
Component: algebra | Keywords:
Work_issues: | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: John Palmieri, Martin Raum | Author: Martin Raum, John
Palmieri
Merged: | Dependencies:
------------------------------------------+---------------------------------
Changes (by jhpalmieri):
* status: needs_review => positive_review
* reviewer: => John Palmieri, Martin Raum
* milestone: sage-4.7.1 => sage-4.7.2
Comment:
Looks good to me. The point about #11318 is a good one, although I don't
like the way elements of `G.algebra(R)` are printed, compared to elements
of `GroupAlgebra(G,R)`.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6670#comment:19>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
