#11595: Update exact eigenspace routines
------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
Reporter: rbeezer | Owner: jason, was
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_info
Priority: minor | Milestone: sage-4.7.2
Component: linear algebra | Keywords:
Work_issues: | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: | Author: Rob Beezer
Merged: | Dependencies:
------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
Changes (by mraum):
* status: needs_review => needs_info
Comment:
Hi Robert,
I finally started looking at this patch, which clearly is the most
controversial. I read the discussion on sage-devel and I am not sure at
all whether there is a real consensus. I know consistency is a strong
argument, but I just feel bad with having a standard argument that fails
for all but one ring. That won't be beneficial to neither students nor
"us", the researchers.
What about a standard format = None, that if the base ring is QQ leads to
'all' and, otherwise, to 'galois'. If, in the documentation, you put a
warning that for rings different from QQ this might change in the future
(in favour of 'all') than any programmer is informed.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/11595#comment:4>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
