#9494: Add a doctest to benchmark.py
-----------------------------+----------------------------------------------
   Reporter:  demosd235      |          Owner:  mvngu        
       Type:  defect         |         Status:  needs_info   
   Priority:  major          |      Milestone:  sage-4.7.2   
  Component:  documentation  |       Keywords:               
Work_issues:                 |       Upstream:  N/A          
   Reviewer:                 |         Author:  Robert Miller
     Merged:                 |   Dependencies:               
-----------------------------+----------------------------------------------
Changes (by rbeezer):

  * status:  needs_work => needs_info


Comment:

 If an "EXAMPLES" block just has one example, then it is OK to drop the S.
 And if there is no prose before the test, then a double-colon can be used
 to indicate verbatim text next.

 There are excess ... but they cause no harm.  This ticket looks good to
 me.  Am I missing something?  It looks ready for a positive review to me.

 I am working on this as a high-priority ticket for Bug Days 32.

 Rob

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9494#comment:5>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to