#8321: numerical integration with arbitrary precision
-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------
   Reporter:  burcin     |          Owner:  burcin              
       Type:  defect     |         Status:  needs_work          
   Priority:  major      |      Milestone:  sage-4.7.2          
  Component:  symbolics  |       Keywords:  numerics,integration
Work_issues:             |       Upstream:  N/A                 
   Reviewer:             |         Author:  Stefan Reiterer     
     Merged:             |   Dependencies:                      
-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------

Comment(by kcrisman):

 {{{
 # f = e^(-x^2)*log(x) on [17, 42]
 sage: num_int_test(e^(-x^2)*log(x), 17, 42)
 Exact                     = integrate(e^(-x^2)*log(x), x, 17, 42)
 Exact .n()                = 2.59225286296247e-127
 GSL                       = 2.5657285007e-127
 mpmath                    = 2.59225286296247e-127
 }}}
 Gee, I don't like this at all.  So do you think this is a bug?  (And if
 so, in which program?)  GSL is pretty stable, though...
 {{{
         try:
             precision = parent.prec()
             mpmath.mp.prec = precision
             if precision == RDF.precision():
                 mp_f = fast_callable(f, vars=[x], domain=RDF)
 }}}
 What if we called GSL for precisely this use case, not
 {{{fast_callable}}}?  Also, what does Maxima ({{{.nintegrate()}}}) do?

 Good analysis!

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8321#comment:32>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to