#3317: a citation system for Sage components
------------------------+---------------------------------------------------
Reporter: mhampton | Owner: mhampton
Type: task | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-feature
Component: packages | Keywords: citations
Work_issues: | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: | Author: Niels Ranosch, Michael Brickenstein,
Burcin Erocal
Merged: | Dependencies:
------------------------+---------------------------------------------------
Changes (by newvalueoldvalue):
* status: new => needs_review
* author: => Niels Ranosch, Michael Brickenstein, Burcin Erocal
Comment:
The benchmarking results are available on [http://sage-
citation.blogspot.com/2011/08/awful-benchmarks.html] and
[https://bitbucket.org/niels_mfo/sage-
citation/src/74ea62a5c9b3/benchmark/].
I still think, it would be best, if pybtex would become a standard
package.
Is there any work needed for the reference manual (referring to
jhpalmieri's comment)?
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/3317#comment:14>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
