#9562: Add M4RIE to Sage
---------------------------------------------------+------------------------
Reporter: malb | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status:
needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-5.0
Component: packages | Keywords: m4ri,
sd32
Work_issues: Fix some docs and fix "randomize()" | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: Paul Zimmermann, Simon King | Author: Martin
Albrecht
Merged: | Dependencies: #11574
---------------------------------------------------+------------------------
Changes (by malb):
* status: needs_info => needs_review
Comment:
Replying to [comment:112 SimonKing]:
> m4rie_for_sage.patch did not apply on top of my private patch chain.
Ouch, how unfortunate. I guess it's in {{{matrix_space.py}}}?
> The conflict is with #4260. So, one should be made dependent on the
other.
I'm not so sure about this. They are fairly independent. I suggest each is
reviewed independently and whichever gets in later is re-based
accordingly.
> Martin, what seems to be more stable? This M4RIE patches? Or the Linbox
patches?
I'd say M4RIE:
* the M4RIE interface has been around for months and months
* I'm willing to debug any issue that might come up because I'm quite
invested in this ticket.
* Many people have looked at M4RIE over the time.
* The LinBox switch-over has not received a single review yet.
* You reported some speed issues with the new LinBox interface
* It is unclearly whether the new LinBox interface works/builds on
anything besides 64-bit Linux.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9562#comment:113>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
