#10667: Morphisms and Objects of Categories
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
Reporter: SimonKing | Owner: nthiery
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_work
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-5.0
Component: categories | Keywords: objects morphisms containment
Work_issues: doctests | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: | Author: Simon King
Merged: | Dependencies: #9138, #11115
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
Comment(by SimonKing):
Replying to [comment:40 nthiery]:
> Alas, I don't have yet the schedule for my classes this fall to see
whether I could come to the Sage days at KL. Are you planning to come to
France anytime soon?
I will be in Kaiserslautern, but apart from that I have no plans at all.
But there should be some travel money available from my project...
For the record: Steenrod algebra tests pass fully. I am still having
trouble to find the right order of base classes for dynamic classes.
Probably it would not be possible at all. Thus, with my current patch (not
posted), I catch the resulting type error, and return a generic class
(such as `Objects().HomCategory`) for implementing the hom category of a
category.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/10667#comment:41>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
