#11779: python ints vs sage ints with respect to powers weirdness
------------------------+---------------------------------------------------
Reporter: dimpase | Owner: AlexGhitza
Type: defect | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-4.7.2
Component: coercion | Keywords:
Work_issues: | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: | Author: Dmitrii Pasechnik
Merged: | Dependencies:
------------------------+---------------------------------------------------
Comment(by leif):
Also
{{{
sage: type(int(3)^RR(-3))
<type 'sage.rings.real_mpfr.RealNumber'>
}}}
is wrong.
Worse:
{{{
sage: type(int(3)^RR(3))
<type 'sage.rings.real_mpfr.RealNumber'>
}}}
Much worse:
{{{
sage: type(int(3)^CC(3))
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
AttributeError Traceback (most recent call
last)
/tmp/Sage/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/devel/sage-11778/<ipython console> in
<module>()
/tmp/Sage/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/local/lib/python2.6/site-
packages/sage/rings/complex_number.so in
sage.rings.complex_number.ComplexNumber.__pow__
(sage/rings/complex_number.c:6289)()
AttributeError: 'int' object has no attribute 'log'
}}}
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/11779#comment:7>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.