#11776: Holding an expression unevaluated: Something like hold_all() would be
nice.
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
Reporter: Pap | Owner: jason
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: minor | Milestone: sage-duplicate/invalid/wontfix
Component: misc | Keywords:
Work_issues: | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: | Author:
Merged: | Dependencies:
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
Changes (by nbruin):
* milestone: sage-4.7.2 => sage-duplicate/invalid/wontfix
Comment:
Replying to [comment:4 kcrisman]:
> Does it look like #10035 is what you are asking for? I'm not sure
whether these are dups, though it seems like they might be.
Yes! two people come up independently with the same solution. I think a
context is the most convenient practical solution.
I'm reassigning the ticket to "duplicate" and put it up for review. (I
think that is the procedure?) If someone else confirms the "dup" status
they can give it a positive review. Otherwise, just revert the milestone
and revert to "new status.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/11776#comment:5>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
