#10952: better numerical accuracy testing
-----------------------------------------------------------------------+----
Reporter: robertwb |
Owner: mvngu
Type: enhancement |
Status: needs_review
Priority: critical |
Milestone: sage-4.7.2
Component: doctest |
Keywords: sd32
Work_issues: |
Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: Jason Grout, Mariah Lenox, William Stein, John Palmieri |
Author: Robert Bradshaw, Rob Beezer
Merged: |
Dependencies:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------+----
Comment(by leif):
Replying to [comment:36 robertwb]:
> You're talking about the {{{check_with_tolerance}}} function and
helpers. One could add a variable to keep track of this and conditionally
emit it; not sure if the added complexity is worth the tiny savings.
Added complexity? One boolean variable, initialized to false and set to
`True` in only a few places?
This not only reduces the file size and run (import!) time but also avoids
more potential name clashes.
Why should one add useless code to each and every file to doctest not
using `# tol`?
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/10952#comment:37>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
