#11747: is_monomial and is_term
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
Reporter: was | Owner: AlexGhitza
Type: defect | Status: positive_review
Priority: minor | Milestone: sage-4.7.2
Component: algebra | Keywords: sd32
Work_issues: | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: Mike Hansen | Author: William Stein
Merged: | Dependencies:
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
Comment(by leif):
Any clue what can cause the following?
{{{
sage -t -long -force_lib
"devel/sage/sage/rings/polynomial/multi_polynomial_element.py"
**********************************************************************
File
"/tmp/Sage/release/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/devel/sage/sage/rings/polynomial/multi_polynomial_element.py",
line 101:
sage: x + QQbar.random_element() # indirect doctest
Expected:
x - 2
Got:
x + 4
**********************************************************************
1 items had failures:
1 of 5 in __main__.example_2
***Test Failed*** 1 failures.
}}}
This doesn't happen with only this patch applied, and no other patch
(merged so far) touches
`sage/rings/polynomial/multi_polynomial_element.py` (nor `qqbar.py`).
No single of the other patches merged with this one seems to cause this
doctest error alone, i.e., apparently only a combination.
(And it's ''not'' #10635.)
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/11747#comment:5>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
