#11586: bug in p-adic extension norm method
-------------------------------------+--------------------------------------
Reporter: was | Owner: roed
Type: defect | Status: positive_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-pending
Component: padics | Keywords: padic
Work_issues: | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: Jennifer Balakrishnan | Author: David Roe
Merged: | Dependencies: #8241
-------------------------------------+--------------------------------------
Comment(by leif):
Replying to [comment:6 davidloeffler]:
> Isn't this what we have a milestone "sage-pending" for?
I personally don't use "sage-pending" for ''that'' situation, since my
script does dependency checking, so won't attempt to merge it, but
considers it for inclusion, i.e., I'll see that it has positive review,
and all of its dependencies with their state.
My interpretation (or use) of "sage-pending" is to postpone tickets for
''other'' reasons, so I currently only see that they're postponed, and
don't consider them further.
I thought this was the original intent, to have some "formal" way to plan
which tickets get merged when during management of a specific release,
also since we don't have milestones for devel releases.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/11586#comment:7>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
