#10620: Upgrade Sphinx to version 1.0.6 (or later)
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
   Reporter:  davidm       |          Owner:  mvngu                      
       Type:  enhancement  |         Status:  needs_review               
   Priority:  minor        |      Milestone:  sage-4.7.2                 
  Component:  packages     |       Keywords:  sphinx upgrade spkg autodoc
Work_issues:               |       Upstream:  N/A                        
   Reviewer:               |         Author:  David Monarres             
     Merged:               |   Dependencies:                             
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
Changes (by jhpalmieri):

  * status:  needs_work => needs_review


Comment:

 Replying to [comment:14 hivert]:
 > Replying to [comment:13 jhpalmieri]:
 >
 > Thanks for building the new spkg !
 >
 > > By the way, we could use the new spkg (either version) and keep the
 Sage library intact; this would use the old, and now somewhat out-dated,
 sage_autodoc.py, but it does not have the cross-reference problems.
 >
 > Concerning cross references, I've been doing some work in #9128. So my
 suggestion is to upgrade the spkg (I can probably find the time to review
 it this week) and the keep the cross reference problem for another ticket.
 What to you think ?

 It makes me uncomfortable to have sage_autodoc.py so out-of-synch with
 autodoc.py, and as far as I can tell, changes to autodoc.py, and hence to
 the updated sage_autodoc.py, are what is causing the problem with the
 cross-references.  So I think just merging the spkg would only be
 acceptable if the work on #9128 (or elsewhere?) includes updating
 sage_autodoc.py.  What do you think of the idea of putting that file in
 the Sphinx directory (as in the "p1" version of the spkg) instead of
 keeping it in the Sage library?

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/10620#comment:15>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to