#11130: Update PARI to version 2.5.0
--------------------------------------------+-------------------------------
   Reporter:  jdemeyer                      |          Owner:  jdemeyer         
                                              
       Type:  defect                        |         Status:  positive_review  
                                              
   Priority:  critical                      |      Milestone:  sage-4.7.2       
                                              
  Component:  packages                      |       Keywords:  pari spkg sd32   
                                              
Work_issues:                                |       Upstream:  N/A              
                                              
   Reviewer:  John Cremona, Jeroen Demeyer  |         Author:  Jeroen Demeyer, 
John Cremona                                   
     Merged:                                |   Dependencies:  #11304, #11540, 
#11321 (install this '''after''' building PARI)
--------------------------------------------+-------------------------------

Comment(by jdemeyer):

 Replying to [comment:118 davidloeffler]:
 > I'm confused: is #11321 a prerequisite for this ticket, or not?
 Yes, it is.
 > I'm puzzled because these two tickets are listed as prerequisites for
 each other.
 That's correct.  These two tickets need to be merged together, one will
 not work without the other.  leif wants to change #11321 such that it does
 not depend on this ticket, but I think that's unnecessary.

 > Is the proposal to close this ticket and merge the lcalc 1.23.p8 spkg
 from #11321, but not the two subsequent patches on that ticket, and the
 "needs review" there applies to the subsequent patches?
 needs_review on that ticket applies to everything.  I created the .p8,
 leif raised some concerns about the .p8 and is proposing a .p9 but it
 doesn't materialize.

 > Or are we going to wait for a p9 spkg at #11321, in which case we would
 probably need to test everything here over again?
 As far as I'm concerned, we can merge the .p8 as it is but it still
 needs_review.  I don't believe leif's concerns are serious enough that
 they should prevent the spkg from being merged.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/11130#comment:119>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to