#11812: traceback with load and attach of .sage files
-----------------------+----------------------------------------------------
Reporter: mstreng | Owner: jason
Type: defect | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-4.7.2
Component: misc | Keywords:
Work_issues: | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: | Author:
Merged: | Dependencies:
-----------------------+----------------------------------------------------
Comment(by leif):
A few minor issues:
* `if preparse_to_file == None:` should be `if preparse_to_file
`'''`is`'''` None:`.
* There's some mark-up missing in the docstrings (also in parts you
didn't add).
* In docstrings, Python identifiers (constants, function and variable
names etc.) and the like should be enclosed in double backticks
({{{``name``}}}, which means Courier / typewriter font); {{{`name`}}} in
contrast yields typesetting in ''math'' mode.
[[BR]]
I'm not sure what your problem with doctests involving tracebacks exactly
was; we have a couple of such tests (not needing to call `sage` or use the
`PExpect` interface); they just look slightly different to what you get in
a real Sage session.
You can also use continuation lines in examples and doctests by the way,
but again they're (currently still) a bit different such that you cannot
directly paste them from a Sage session, i.e., you have to use the Python
form instead of Sage's (cf. #10458).
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/11812#comment:7>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
