#12019: doctest failure in linear_programming.rst (multiple correct solutions)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
Reporter: emil
| Owner: ncohen
Type: defect
| Status: needs_review
Priority: minor
| Milestone: sage-4.8
Component: linear programming
| Keywords: doctests, linear programming,
GLPK, multible solutions
Work_issues: assessment if funtionality is tested elsewhere, if not create
TEST section with example with unique solution, change help docstring so users
are aware of multible solutions | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer:
| Author:
Merged:
| Dependencies:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
Changes (by ncohen):
* status: new => needs_review
Comment:
I think that adding a flag "not tested" to this line is more than
sufficient in this case. The LP code is being tested in so many places
(and the matching stuff too), that everything would fail (and actually
does, when there is the slightest bug with MIP) if there is anything
wrong.
Nathann
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12019#comment:2>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
