#11115: Rewrite cached_method in Cython
-------------------------------------------------------------------+--------
Reporter: SimonKing |
Owner: jason
Type: enhancement |
Status: needs_review
Priority: major |
Milestone: sage-pending
Component: misc |
Keywords: category cython cache
Work_issues: |
Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: Nicolas M. Thiéry, Andrey Novoseltsev, Volker Braun |
Author: Simon King
Merged: |
Dependencies: #9976, #11298, #11342, #9138, #11815, #11972
-------------------------------------------------------------------+--------
Comment(by SimonKing):
Replying to [comment:168 novoselt]:
> The doctest patch looks fine to me. But as I understand it, before this
one is switched to positive review, its implicit dependency #11900 must be
approved.
Of course, it can only be ''merged'' if all dependencies have been merged.
But as far as I understand (I know several examples), a patch can get a
positive ''review'' even when one of its dependencies needs work.
But perhaps the release manager can tell more?
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/11115#comment:169>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
