#11521: Memleak when resolving the action of Integers on an Elliptic Curve
------------------------+---------------------------------------------------
Reporter: jpflori | Owner: robertwb
Type: defect | Status: needs_work
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-4.8
Component: coercion | Keywords: sd35
Work_issues: | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: | Author: Simon King
Merged: | Dependencies: #11900 #715
------------------------+---------------------------------------------------
Comment(by jpflori):
I agree to move the discussion for "==" and "is" to #715 (and also agree
with your solution).
So, what about the original problem here and your thoughts about moving
the weakref from the action itself to its domains and codomains?
If you really dislike the idea of having an option switched off by default
(and a priori only on in the coercion model and not outside it unless one
knows what he is doing), we could mimick what you wanna do with the
TripleDict and have the usual Functor and a Functor_weakref version (or
you can go the other way around and add an extra arg to the TripleDict
constructor taking the equality operator as argument :) rather than having
two classes)?
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/11521#comment:103>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
