#12246: Wiener index without dictionnary
-----------------------------+----------------------------------------------
Reporter: dcoudert | Owner: jason, ncohen, rlm
Type: PLEASE CHANGE | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-5.0
Component: graph theory | Keywords:
Work_issues: | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: | Author:
Merged: | Dependencies: #12244
-----------------------------+----------------------------------------------
Comment(by ncohen):
Helloooooooo !!!
I think I had the same problem a looong time ago, and I probably chosed
the nasty way out. What happens when you cite the paper while not defining
them in the same function ? Are the links broken, or fo they redirect
toward the other function's references ?
The release manager is wise but his wrath is terrifying. In particular, he
does not like warnings, so we should avoid that `:-D`
By the way (and I know that the difference in runtime is very small), it
is easier to check whether a graph is connected than to count the number
of connected components. So in the process, could you replace
``self.connected_components_number() == 1`` by ``self.is_connected()`` ?
If the references are broken when you cite in one method the references
defined in another one, I'd say that duplicating them and changing the
name (add a number at the end, or a letter) is not thaaaaaat bad anyway
`:-)`
Nathann
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12246#comment:4>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
