#12252: latex(number field) sometimes looks stupid (though is technically
correct)
-----------------------------+----------------------------------------------
Reporter: was | Owner: davidloeffler
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: minor | Milestone: sage-5.0
Component: number fields | Keywords:
Work_issues: | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: | Author:
Merged: | Dependencies:
-----------------------------+----------------------------------------------
Description changed by was:
Old description:
> For example,
> {{{
> sage: K = NumberField(x^2 +1, 'i'); K
> Number Field in i with defining polynomial x^2 + 1
> sage: latex(K)
> \Bold{Q}[i]/(i^{2} + 1)
> }}}
>
> Any mathematician would smirk at this.
New description:
For example,
{{{
sage: K = NumberField(x^2 +1, 'i'); K
Number Field in i with defining polynomial x^2 + 1
sage: latex(K)
\Bold{Q}[i]/(i^{2} + 1)
}}}
Some might smirk at this. Another worse one:
{{{
sage: latex(QuadraticField(-1))
\Bold{Q}[\sqrt{-1}]/(\sqrt{-1}^{2} + 1)
}}}
--
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12252#comment:1>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
