#10032: Even more improvements in plot documentation
------------------------+---------------------------------------------------
Reporter: kcrisman | Owner: jason, was
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: minor | Milestone: sage-4.8
Component: graphics | Keywords: beginner
Work_issues: | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: | Author:
Merged: | Dependencies:
------------------------+---------------------------------------------------
Changes (by kcrisman):
* keywords: => beginner
Old description:
> This is a followup to #9746, to make the docs even better. In addition
> to the things below, we should put in references like there will now be
> in `matrix_plot` (see #9740) to the actual function in the documentation.
>
> {{{
> In scatterplot, there is another one of those 'these are equivalent'
> things, but they're not separated out. Also, I get
> code{scatter_plot.options} instead of the actual code. Should it be
> show() or show()?
>
> In sage.plot.polygon.polygon we have something similar in the examples -
> somehow you only got some of them. Again with the extra options guy, too.
>
> Same with the equivalent in point.py, in both point and points.
>
> In the plot_field.py file, why did you once add the x,y variable
> declaration and once not? It doesn't really matter to me, but I wonder if
> there is something I'm missing. Again with the show() or show(), and the
> equivalent. It's not so important to me with the equivalent showing two
> things, but I feel like maybe you changed that one place - or maybe not.
>
> In plot.py, ironically, just above the place where you fixed the
> 1.5/(1+e^(-x)) thing, there are a bunch of plots I didn't separate in my
> custom ticks patch. My apologies - but there they are! I also still get
> an error 'ellipsis object not callable' or something in 'add grid lines
> at specific positions (using lists/tuples)'. There's an ellipsis that got
> stuck in there still somehow - I think you got a different one of these.
>
> In line.py, after the cool cat there are a couple things as in the
> previous files - one nonseparated, one equivalent issue/show() issue.
>
> In disk.py, maybe the disk that is parallel to the xy-plane should be
> plotted, not just its type? Same equiv/show question.
>
> I don't know what happened in density plot, but I think a tick is missing
> in the DensityPlot documentation - likely my fault? This is in
> 'Examples'.
>
> In contour plot, the very last example under region_plot should have two
> plots, but has one. But they are different.
>
> The circles also has the parallel to the xy-plane issue when it comes to
> giving the type, but not the plot.
> }}}
New description:
This is a followup to #9746, to make the docs even better. In addition to
the things below, we should put in references like there will now be in
`matrix_plot` (see #9740) to the actual function in the documentation.
{{{
In scatterplot, there is another one of those 'these are equivalent'
things, but they're not separated out. Also, I get
code{scatter_plot.options} instead of the actual code. Should it be show()
or show()?
In sage.plot.polygon.polygon we have something similar in the examples -
somehow you only got some of them. Again with the extra options guy, too.
Also, "Extra options will get passed on to show()" should have a
hyperlink.
Same with the equivalent in point.py, in both point and points.
In the plot_field.py file, why did you once add the x,y variable
declaration and once not? It doesn't really matter to me, but I wonder if
there is something I'm missing. Again with the show() or show(), and the
equivalent. It's not so important to me with the equivalent showing two
things, but I feel like maybe you changed that one place - or maybe not.
In plot.py, ironically, just above the place where you fixed the
1.5/(1+e^(-x)) thing, there are a bunch of plots I didn't separate in my
custom ticks patch. My apologies - but there they are! I also still get an
error 'ellipsis object not callable' or something in 'add grid lines at
specific positions (using lists/tuples)'. There's an ellipsis that got
stuck in there still somehow - I think you got a different one of these.
In line.py, after the cool cat there are a couple things as in the
previous files - one nonseparated, one equivalent issue/show() issue.
In disk.py, maybe the disk that is parallel to the xy-plane should be
plotted, not just its type? Same equiv/show question.
I don't know what happened in density plot, but I think a tick is missing
in the DensityPlot documentation - likely my fault? This is in 'Examples'.
In contour plot, the very last example under region_plot should have two
plots, but has one. But they are different.
The circles also has the parallel to the xy-plane issue when it comes to
giving the type, but not the plot.
}}}
--
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/10032#comment:6>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
