#11900: Serious regression caused by #9138
--------------------------------------------------------------------------+-
   Reporter:  SimonKing                                                   |     
     Owner:  tbd                         
       Type:  defect                                                      |     
    Status:  positive_review             
   Priority:  critical                                                    |     
 Milestone:  sage-5.0                    
  Component:  performance                                                 |     
  Keywords:  categories regression       
Work_issues:                                                              |     
  Upstream:  N/A                         
   Reviewer:  Jeroen Demeyer, Nicolas M. ThiƩry, Simon King, Jason Grout  |     
    Author:  Simon King                  
     Merged:                                                              |   
Dependencies:  #11319, #9138, #11911, #9562
--------------------------------------------------------------------------+-

Comment(by was):

 Replying to [comment:248 SimonKing]:
 > Aha, is it because some people do not have gcc but install a Sage-
 binary?

 Standard (non-optional) tests are allowed to depend on gcc.  I don't know
 if this is written in stone anywhere, but there have been many such
 standard tests in the past.  They aren't a problem for buildbots, since
 they always have GCC installed.

 If nothing else, it is very important to test that calling the compiler
 from Sage does work.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/11900#comment:249>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to