#6371: Implement Riemann theta functions
-----------------------------------------------+----------------------------
Reporter: ncalexan | Owner: cswiercz
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_work
Priority: minor | Milestone: sage-4.8
Component: numerical | Keywords: riemann theta
klein
Work_issues: | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: Marco Streng, Bernard Deconinck | Author: Nick
Alexander, Chris Swierczewski
Merged: | Dependencies:
-----------------------------------------------+----------------------------
Comment(by mstreng):
Hi Chris,
Replying to [comment:32 cswiercz]:
> If you know of an alternate way to enable symbolics then I'd love to
hear about it!
I don't: I've never implemented any of them.
> In practice, $\Omega$ is treated more as a parameter than an argument of
the Riemann theta function. That is, $\Omega$ is usually fixed and $z$
varies.
:) Actually, when I use theta functions in my research, Omega is usually
the variable and z is usually some fixed vector in with entries in QQ.
Anyway, what is the (programming technical) reason for having objects that
depend on Omega? Is there some kind of caching involved? Some part of the
algorithm that depends on Omega only and that you only want to do once?
Marco
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6371#comment:33>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.