#11638: Patch: add integration unit tests
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
Reporter: mjo | Owner: burcin
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: minor | Milestone: sage-5.0
Component: symbolics | Keywords:
Work_issues: | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: | Author: Michael Orlitzky
Merged: | Dependencies:
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
Comment(by kcrisman):
Replying to [comment:3 mjo]:
> This was my first patch, so I just didn't know where to put things. The
''best'' thing to do would be get #12094 and #11483 reviewed so that more
of these will work. Then we could stick them in the appropriate TESTS
block.
Does that mean #12094 is ready for review?
> Although, it is nice to have a collection of known bugs: you can always
run them to see if a bug has been fixed by a package upgrade. If any have,
it's trivial to copy/paste the doctest out and remove the optional flag.
Not a bad point. We actually already have a similar file - look at
calculus/wester.py.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/11638#comment:4>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
