#11590: Integrating the sgn() function can produce incorrect results
------------------------+---------------------------------------------------
Reporter: mjo | Owner: burcin
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone:
Component: calculus | Keywords:
Work_issues: | Upstream: Reported upstream. Developers
acknowledge bug.
Reviewer: | Author:
Merged: | Dependencies:
------------------------+---------------------------------------------------
Comment(by mjo):
I took a much stupider approach, but I did essentially try replacing
`$INTEGRATE` with `%INTEGRATE`. Once I discovered the `(#$$)` syntax, I
tried replacing the call to `maxima_eval` in `sr_integral` with a simple
string substitution. It causes more problems than it solves, I think.
If I replace `meval` with `meval*` in a few places, I'm able to break some
additional things but not fix any =)
I guess the Right Thing to do would be to go read the maxima source...
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/11590#comment:9>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
