#12423: Numpy wrongly assumes that any non-i386 OS X system is PowerPC
------------------------+---------------------------------------------------
Reporter: jdemeyer | Owner: tbd
Type: defect | Status: needs_work
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-5.0
Component: packages | Keywords:
Work_issues: | Upstream: Fixed upstream, but not in a stable
release.
Reviewer: | Author: Jeroen Demeyer
Merged: | Dependencies:
------------------------+---------------------------------------------------
Changes (by was):
* status: needs_review => needs_work
Comment:
Please remove everything from the patch that involves deleting support for
Cygwin. Though I'm now not gung ho about the future of porting Sage to
Cygwin and using it, I definitely don't think we should start silently
sneaking in removing bits of cygwin support left and right all over in
Sage! If somebody already did the work to figure out how to get numpy to
build on Cygwin, let's not just delete that. What if I'm wrong, and it
turns out that some genius does get Sage working well on Cygwin (and if
nothing else, deleting cygwin support should be a different ticket).
The actual change for OS X 10.7 seems to be:
* general clean up SPKG.txt -- good!
* test for "intel" or "i386" instead of just "i386" -- can't be bad.
So I think the cygwin deletions should be deleted from this patch, then
this should get a positive review once somebody checks that it actually
works.
William
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12423#comment:11>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.