#12513: Slow CDF fast_callable powers
-----------------------------+----------------------------------------------
   Reporter:  robertwb       |          Owner:  jason, jkantor 
       Type:  PLEASE CHANGE  |         Status:  new            
   Priority:  major          |      Milestone:  sage-5.0       
  Component:  numerical      |       Keywords:                 
Work_issues:                 |       Upstream:  N/A            
   Reviewer:                 |         Author:  Robert Bradshaw
     Merged:                 |   Dependencies:                 
-----------------------------+----------------------------------------------
 Before

 {{{
 sage: var('x,y')
 (x, y)
 sage: f = (sum(x^k for k in [-10..10]) * sum(y^k for k in
 [-10..10])).expand()
 sage: ff = fast_callable(f, CDF, (x,y))
 sage: %timeit ff(1+2j, 3+4j)
 125 loops, best of 3: 4.53 ms per loop
 sage: len(ff.python_calls())
 756
 sage: ff.python_calls()[:10]
 [(^10), (^10), (^10), (^9), (^9), (^10), (^10), (^8), (^9), (^9)]
 }}}

 which is still better than

 {{{
 sage: %timeit f(x=1+2j, y=3+4j)
 25 loops, best of 3: 12 ms per loop
 }}}

 but nowhere close to

 {{{
 sage: var('x,y')
 (x, y)
 sage: f = (sum(x^k for k in [-10..10]) * sum(y^k for k in
 [-10..10])).expand()
 sage: ff = fast_callable(f, CDF, (x,y))
 sage: %timeit ff(1+2j, 3+4j)
 625 loops, best of 3: 127 µs per loop
 sage: len(ff.python_calls())
 0
 sage: 4.53 / .127
 35.6692913385827
 }}}

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12513>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to