#11666: Upgrade MPFR to 3.1.0
--------------------------------------------+-------------------------------
Reporter: leif | Owner: leif
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_info
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-5.0
Component: packages | Keywords: sd32 MPFR spkg
wishlist sd35.5
Work_issues: failing doctests for 32 bits | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: Paul Zimmermann | Author: Mike Hansen,
Jean-Pierre Flori
Merged: | Dependencies: #12171
--------------------------------------------+-------------------------------
Comment(by zimmerma):
I tried this patch (with dependencies) on top of Sage 4.8 and got several
doctests failures:
{{{
sage -t
devel/sage-11666/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/ell_rational_field.py # 2
doctests failed
sage -t devel/sage-11666/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/heegner.py
# 2 doctests failed
sage -t devel/sage-11666/sage/matrix/matrix2.pyx # 3 doctests
failed
sage -t devel/sage-11666/sage/combinat/partition.py # 30 doctests
failed
sage -t devel/sage-11666/sage/calculus/calculus.py # 7 doctests
failed
sage -t devel/sage-11666/sage/misc/randstate.pyx # 13 doctests
failed
sage -t devel/sage-11666/sage/misc/misc.py # 1 doctests failed
sage -t devel/sage-11666/sage/modules/free_module_element.pyx # 2
doctests failed
sage -t devel/sage-11666/sage/rings/real_mpfr.pyx # 12 doctests
failed
sage -t devel/sage-11666/sage/matrix/constructor.py # 2 doctests
failed
sage -t devel/sage-11666/sage/combinat/sloane_functions.py # 5
doctests failed
sage -t devel/sage-11666/sage/misc/cachefunc.py # 14 doctests
failed
sage -t devel/sage-11666/sage/combinat/combinat.py # 1 doctests
failed
sage -t devel/sage-11666/sage/libs/fplll/fplll.pyx #
Killed/crashed
sage -t devel/sage-11666/sage/combinat/species/species.py # 3
doctests failed
sage -t devel/sage-11666/sage/combinat/species/sum_species.py # 3
doctests failed
sage -t
devel/sage-11666/sage/combinat/species/permutation_species.py # 3 doctests
failed
sage -t
devel/sage-11666/sage/sets/disjoint_union_enumerated_sets.py # 8 doctests
failed
sage -t devel/sage-11666/sage/matrix/matrix_mpolynomial_dense.pyx
# 2 doctests failed
sage -t
devel/sage-11666/sage/combinat/species/partition_species.py # 4 doctests
failed
sage -t devel/sage-11666/sage/combinat/species/product_species.py
# 2 doctests failed
sage -t devel/sage-11666/sage/rings/complex_field.py # 4 doctests
failed
sage -t devel/sage-11666/sage/rings/complex_interval_field.py # 3
doctests failed
sage -t devel/sage-11666/sage/combinat/partitions.pyx # 1
doctests failed
sage -t devel/sage-11666/sage/rings/real_mpfi.pyx # 5 doctests
failed
}}}
Can someone reproduce that?
Paul
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/11666#comment:34>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
