#12341: Empty (full) cremona database in Sage 4.8 causes tests to fail
-------------------------------+--------------------------------------------
Reporter: swenson | Owner: cremona
Type: defect | Status: needs_review
Priority: critical | Milestone: sage-5.0
Component: elliptic curves | Keywords:
Work_issues: | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: John Cremona | Author: R. Andrew Ohana
Merged: | Dependencies:
-------------------------------+--------------------------------------------
Changes (by cremona):
* reviewer: => John Cremona
Comment:
Patch applies fine and all elliptic_curves tests pass both before and
after installing the optional database (which with 5.0.bets5 I installed
with a plain "sage -i database_cremona_ellcurve").
I have not checked all the logic in the revised code. I was puzzled by
the remark about testing with flag --optional since I thought that only
made sense with some sensible string after the word "optional", e.g.
"magma". But it seems that there are doctest lines which are tagged "#
optional" with no mention of which optional package is relevant. Possibly
for this reason, I had weird failures with
{{{
sage -t --optional devel/sage-
main/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/lseries_ell.py # 3 doctests failed
}}}
which may have nothing to do with this ticket.
I hesitate to set this to Positive Review since I really don't understand
what it going on, but at least I have done something and reported what has
happened.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12341#comment:13>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
