#12471: real evaluation of symbolic expressions with complex coefficients
----------------------------+-----------------------------------------------
   Reporter:  burcin        |          Owner:  burcin       
       Type:  defect        |         Status:  needs_review 
   Priority:  major         |      Milestone:  sage-5.0     
  Component:  symbolics     |       Keywords:               
Work_issues:                |       Upstream:  N/A          
   Reviewer:  Daniel Krenn  |         Author:  Burcin Erocal
     Merged:                |   Dependencies:               
----------------------------+-----------------------------------------------

Comment(by kcrisman):

 Daniel, thanks for looking at this.  It looks pretty good, and don't worry
 about the mixed messages from the patchbot you mentioned on
 [http://groups.google.com/group/sage-
 
devel/browse_thread/thread/8499ccf849b7833a/2c3678a00cd47447?show_docid=2c3678a00cd47447&pli=1
 sage-devel] - the only failure was
 {{{
 RuntimeError: Unexpected EOF from Gap executing UnorderedTuples([0, 1, 2,
 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9],1);
 }}}
 in the symbolic ring code, and that was on 4.8, not 5.0.beta3.  If you
 think the code is right, isn't making some new assumption that would lead
 to a bug, is properly doctested, and passes tests, you should be good to
 give it positive review.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12471#comment:3>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to