#10296: Singular interface wasting time by waiting for the prompt too often
-----------------------------------------------------------------------+----
    Reporter:  SimonKing                                               |        
 Owner:  was            
        Type:  enhancement                                             |        
Status:  needs_review   
    Priority:  major                                                   |     
Milestone:  sage-5.0       
   Component:  interfaces                                              |    
Resolution:                 
    Keywords:  Singular, _eval_line, synchronization, synchronisation  |   
Work_issues:                 
    Upstream:  N/A                                                     |      
Reviewer:  Martin Albrecht
      Author:  Simon King                                              |        
Merged:                 
Dependencies:  #11431                                                  |  
-----------------------------------------------------------------------+----

Comment(by SimonKing):

 Replying to [comment:62 malb]:
 > I only have some very minor comments:
 >
 >  * Could you escape EOFError with "``" backquotes so it's printed as
 code

 Done

 >  * You wrote: "Since nesting of _eval_line can not occur during garbage
 collection" can you explain that, I am not sure I understand.

 I elaborated the comment.

 Without my patch, garbage collection would result in a call to _eval_line.
 So, if garbage collection occurs while being in _eval_line, we would have
 two nested calls to _eval_line. The inner _eval_line would receive the
 Singular prompt and return. The outer _eval_line would also wait for a
 Singular prompt -- but Singular would not provide a second prompt. Result:
 A deadlock.

 To my understanding, this is why synchronisation of the Singular interface
 was necessary. But with my patch, garbage collection does not involve an
 additional call to _eval_line, and thus the deadlock is prevented without
 synchronisation.

 >  * why did you indent REMARK etc. further in pid()?

 To the contrary, the first line of the doc string of pid() needed to be
 indented more! Fixed with the new patch version.

 Apply trac10296_singular_overhead_combined.patch

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/10296#comment:63>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to