#6588: Categories for root systems and many misc improvements
--------------------------------------------------------+-------------------
Reporter: nthiery | Owner:
mhansen
Type: enhancement | Status:
positive_review
Priority: major | Milestone:
sage-5.0
Component: combinatorics | Keywords: root
systems, categories
Work_issues: | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: Anne Schilling, Mark Shimozono, PatchBot | Author:
Nicolas M. ThiƩry
Merged: | Dependencies:
#10817
--------------------------------------------------------+-------------------
Changes (by aschilling):
* status: needs_review => positive_review
Comment:
> > How about self.fundamental_weights(extended = True) with default
extended = False?
>
> Well, since it's an abuse, and one that we might want to get rid of,
> I'd rather not abuse yet another function. Unless you have a natural
> use case for this notation? (for the extended weight lattice, that's
> just self.basis()).
Ok, since this is in self.basis() I am satisfied.
> Yes, thanks! I have folded together all patches and posted them
> here. I also did the reindentation and renaming *_lattice_realization
> -> *_lattice_realizations. On my side, the patch is good to go.
Ok, thanks! Unless I hear otherwise from Mark, I'll set a positive review.
Cheers,
Anne
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6588#comment:22>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.