#11888: Sage is missing the lambert_w function
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
Reporter: benjaminfjones
| Owner: burcin
Type: defect
| Status: needs_review
Priority: minor
| Milestone: sage-5.0
Component: symbolics
| Keywords: lambert_w symbolics conversion maxima sd35.5
Work_issues:
| Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: Keshav Kini, Karl-Dieter Crisman, Fredrik Johansson, Burcin
Erocal | Author: Benjamin Jones
Merged:
| Dependencies: #12507
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
Comment(by kcrisman):
I think that b. makes sense. You'd also have to add `max_lambert_w` at
about [http://hg.sagemath.org/sage-
main/file/c239be1054e0/sage/interfaces/maxima_lib.py#l1093 this spot] but
having numerical integrals would be worth it.
I assume that this is a pretty easy change? If not, I guess we could just
document that this doesn't work yet. In either case something should be
documented, though, since half of our bug reports seem to be people using
new, cool functionality who then expect that new functionality to be fully
featured as well - i.e., it's not really a bug report at all, but a
feature request. Having good doc for what we ''don't'' do will help with
that.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/11888#comment:36>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
