#11445: symbolic integration fails on a very simple test case
--------------------------------------------------------------+-------------
Reporter: pdehaye | Owner:
burcin
Type: defect | Status:
positive_review
Priority: major | Milestone:
sage-5.0
Component: calculus | Resolution:
Keywords: integrate | Work issues:
Report Upstream: Fixed upstream, in a later stable release. | Reviewers:
Karl-Dieter Crisman
Authors: Michael Orlitzky | Merged in:
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
--------------------------------------------------------------+-------------
Changes (by kcrisman):
* status: needs_review => positive_review
* reviewer: => Karl-Dieter Crisman
Comment:
I probably would have put it in
`sage.symbolic.integration.integral.integral` somewhere, where there are
lots of tests, but I guess this is fine, and otherwise all is well. I'd
hate to have you rebase it to that other location, seems a waste... but
then again, that's where they are...
Or what do you think? The problem is that we have no canonical location
for integral stuff. `integrate?` is a wasteland, though it points to
better sources of doc.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/11445#comment:8>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
