#11791: Introspection for interactively defined classes with metaclass
------------------------------------------------------------+---------------
Reporter: SimonKing | Owner:
jason
Type: enhancement | Status:
needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone:
sage-5.0
Component: misc | Resolution:
Keywords: introspection, cython, dynamic metaclass | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Reviewers:
Authors: Simon King | Merged in:
Dependencies: #11298, #11768, #11734, #11115, #10620 | Stopgaps:
------------------------------------------------------------+---------------
Changes (by SimonKing):
* status: needs_work => needs_review
* dependencies: #11298, #11768, #11734, #11115 => #11298, #11768,
#11734, #11115, #10620
* work_issues: needs rebase =>
Comment:
The conflict was with #10620 and is trivial: #10620 changed a pair of "s
into a pair of 's -- and my old patch did the same.
It is updated and needs review (and so does #11768, by the way).
One question, though: I recall that somebody (Jeroen?) mentioned on sage-
devel that one should mark all doc tests requiring a compiler (i.e.,
doctests using cython) as "optional - gcc". Is that true? Then the patch
needs work.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/11791#comment:5>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
