#12650: Perform safe simplifications in Expression.simplify()
------------------------------------+---------------------------------------
Reporter: mjo | Owner: mjo
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_info
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-5.0
Component: symbolics | Resolution:
Keywords: | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Reviewers: David Roe
Authors: Michael Orlitzky | Merged in:
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
------------------------------------+---------------------------------------
Comment (by mjo):
Replying to [comment:10 mjo]:
> No problem. I would suggest removing `simplify_radical()` from
`full_simplify()` entirely if it didn't introduce a misnomer. Maybe
`radicals=True` is the best way to do it, leaving `simplify()` as-is but
making `full_simplify()` useful again.
Now that I think about it, since I don't consider `radcan` a
simplification, I'm OK with just removing it from `full_simplify()`. Would
you be alright with that? I can ask on sage-devel again, and I don't think
many doctests depend on it.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12650#comment:11>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
