#10194: Set factories
-------------------------------------------------+--------------------------
       Reporter:  nthiery                        |         Owner:  hivert      
           Type:  enhancement                    |        Status:  needs_review
       Priority:  major                          |     Milestone:  sage-5.0    
      Component:  combinatorics                  |    Resolution:              
       Keywords:  factories, days30, Cernay2012  |   Work issues:              
Report Upstream:  N/A                            |     Reviewers:              
        Authors:  Florent Hivert                 |     Merged in:              
   Dependencies:                                 |      Stopgaps:              
-------------------------------------------------+--------------------------
Changes (by hivert):

  * status:  new => needs_review


Old description:

> At Sage days 30, a long brainstorm seems to have finalized the design.
> I'm writing a patch on sage combinat queue.

New description:

 At Sage days 30, a long brainstorm seems to have finalized the design.
 Here is a exerpt from the documentation:

 A ''set factory'' `F` is device, whose goal is to construct parent `P`
 which models subsets of a big set `S`. Typically, the `P` s are
 constructed
 within families obtained by putting a bunch of constraints `cons` on the
 elements of the set `S`. In such a hierarchy of subsets, one needs to have
 a
 fine and easy control on the elements construction. That is, one often
 needs
 that `P` constructs elements in a subclass of its usual class for element.
 On
 the contrary, one also often needs `P` to be a facade parent, meaning that
 `P`
 construct element whose actual parent is not `P` itself.

 The role of a set factory is twofold:

 - ''manage a database'' of constructors for the different parents `P =
 F(cons)`
   depending on the various kinds of constraints `cons`. Note: currently
 there
   is no real support for that. We are gathering use case before fixing the
   interface.

 - ensure that the elements `e = P(...)` created by the different parents
   follows a consistent policy concerning their ''class and parent''.

 The patch implement this idea while trying to leave as much as possible
 space
 for further improvement. In particular, I tried to specify the few
 possible
 things about constraints. I'm even not completely sure about
 {{{add_constraints}}}.
 Please comment and review.

 Florent

 '''Apply :''' [attachment:trac_10194-factories_policy-fh.patch trac_10194
 -factories_policy-fh.patch]

--

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/10194#comment:6>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to