#11201: Point users of solve() to the to_poly_solve option
----------------------------------------------------------+-----------------
Reporter: benjaminfjones | Owner: was
Type: enhancement | Status:
needs_review
Priority: minor | Milestone:
Component: interfaces | Resolution:
Keywords: solve, maxima, to_poly_solve, beginner | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Reviewers:
Karl-Dieter Crisman
Authors: A. Fleckenstein | Merged in:
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
----------------------------------------------------------+-----------------
Changes (by {'newvalue': u'A. Fleckenstein', 'oldvalue': ''}):
* status: new => needs_review
* reviewer: => Karl-Dieter Crisman
* author: => A. Fleckenstein
Comment:
A few comments.
* One of the examples is over-indented
* The examples in the global `solve` should be somehow marked as only
applying to single expressions, not lists of expressions (and in
particular `multiplicities` only does, I think)
* The error message or whatever you call it should be doctested
But this is well on the way to a great addition, thank you for taking the
time to do something tedious but necessary. Please feel free to add
yourself to the main list of Trac users, and please put your name as you
desire it in Authors below.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/11201#comment:3>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.