#12785: update the faq: no need for gfortran...
---------------------------------+------------------------------------------
       Reporter:  jhpalmieri     |         Owner:  mvngu   
           Type:  defect         |        Status:  new     
       Priority:  major          |     Milestone:  sage-5.0
      Component:  documentation  |    Resolution:          
       Keywords:                 |   Work issues:          
Report Upstream:  N/A            |     Reviewers:          
        Authors:                 |     Merged in:          
   Dependencies:                 |      Stopgaps:          
---------------------------------+------------------------------------------
Description changed by jdemeyer:

Old description:

> We need to update the Sage FAQ (`SAGE_ROOT/devel/sage/doc/en/faq/faq-
> usage.rst`) to take into account #12369 and #12112.  For example, we
> should remove the reference to gfortran. We should also add a reference
> to Sage building its own gcc if necessary.

New description:

 We need to update the Sage FAQ (`SAGE_ROOT/devel/sage/doc/en/faq/faq-
 usage.rst`) to take into account #12369 and #12112.  For example, we
 should remove the reference to gfortran (and g++ if #12782 gets merged).
 We should also add a reference to Sage building its own gcc if necessary.

--

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12785#comment:5>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to