#12655: Update PolyBoRi to release 0.8.1
----------------------------------------------------------------+-----------
       Reporter:  AlexanderDreyer                               |         
Owner:  AlexanderDreyer                                
           Type:  enhancement                                   |        
Status:  needs_review                                   
       Priority:  major                                         |     
Milestone:  sage-5.0                                       
      Component:  packages                                      |    
Resolution:                                                 
       Keywords:                                                |   Work 
issues:                                                 
Report Upstream:  None of the above - read trac for reasoning.  |     
Reviewers:  Martin Albrecht, Jeroen Demeyer, Leif Leonhardy
        Authors:  Alexander Dreyer                              |     Merged 
in:                                                 
   Dependencies:  #12656, #12750, #12799                        |      
Stopgaps:                                                 
----------------------------------------------------------------+-----------

Comment (by leif):

 Replying to [comment:67 AlexanderDreyer]:
 > Replying to [comment:66 leif]:
 > > If one doesn't want to change the timestamps, one could make the
 `pbori` module just (or also) depend on the `.so` (without a version
 suffix), since the (target of the) latter will always have a fresh
 modification time.
 > The libraries are already listed as `libraries=['polybori',
 'polybori_groebner', 'gd', 'png12', 'm4ri']`. Aren't they considered as
 dependencies anyway?

 Of course the libraries are listed, since they need to get linked to the
 module, but Cython doesn't automatically consider ''their'' timestamps for
 dependency checking, i.e., which modules need to get rebuilt.

 [[BR]]

 > But the timestamp of `include/polybori/config.h` varies, so #12799 fixes
 the problem.

 Then I'd add just that there.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12655#comment:68>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to