#12849: The argspecs of extension function/methods is broken in the Sphinx
documentation
--------------------------------------------------+-------------------------
       Reporter:  hivert                          |         Owner:  mvngu, 
hivert
           Type:  defect                          |        Status:  
needs_review 
       Priority:  critical                        |     Milestone:  sage-5.0    
 
      Component:  documentation                   |    Resolution:              
 
       Keywords:  argspecs Cython                 |   Work issues:              
 
Report Upstream:  N/A                             |     Reviewers:              
 
        Authors:  Florent Hivert, Jeroen Demeyer  |     Merged in:              
 
   Dependencies:                                  |      Stopgaps:              
 
--------------------------------------------------+-------------------------
Changes (by {'newvalue': u'Florent Hivert, Jeroen Demeyer', 'oldvalue': ''}):

  * status:  new => needs_review
  * author:  => Florent Hivert, Jeroen Demeyer


Old description:

> In the current Sphinx HTML doc, the extenstion function and methods have
> no arguments setup.
>
> See for example the documentation of
> {{{
> reference/sage/symbolic/expression.html#sage.symbolic.expression.Expression.N
> }}}
> which was
> [http://www.sagemath.org/doc/reference/sage/symbolic/expression.html#sage.symbolic.expression.Expression.N
> ok (see there)] in Sage 4.8. The problem was introduced in
> sage-5.0.beta8.
>
> We should add a regression test on that kinds of problem:
> [attachment:12849_doctest.patch]

New description:

 In the current Sphinx HTML doc, the extenstion function and methods have
 no arguments setup.

 See for example the documentation of
 {{{
 reference/sage/symbolic/expression.html#sage.symbolic.expression.Expression.N
 }}}
 which was
 
[http://www.sagemath.org/doc/reference/sage/symbolic/expression.html#sage.symbolic.expression.Expression.N
 ok (see there)] in Sage 4.8. The problem was introduced in sage-5.0.beta8.

 We should add a regression test on that kinds of problem.

 ```Apply```:
  - [attachment:12849_doctest.patch]
  - [attachment:trac_12849-extfunc_argspec_html_fix-fh.patch]

--

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12849#comment:13>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to