#12893: Increase doctest coverage in sage/coding/linear_code.py to 100%
------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
Reporter: benjaminfjones | Owner: mvngu
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: minor | Milestone: sage-5.1
Component: documentation | Keywords: linear code doctest coverage
Work issues: | Report Upstream: N/A
Reviewers: | Authors: Benjamin Jones
Merged in: | Dependencies:
Stopgaps: |
------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
As the summary states. As of sage-5.0.beta14 coverage is:
{{{
linear_code.py
SCORE linear_code.py: 82% (52 of 63)
Missing documentation:
* __init__(self, gen_mat):
* _repr_(self):
* ambient_space(self):
* basis(self):
* __contains__(self,v):
* characteristic(self):
* __cmp__(self, right):
Missing doctests:
* bounds_minimum_distance(n, k, F):
* sd_duursma_data(C, i):
* sd_duursma_q(C,i,d0):
* LinearCodeFromVectorSpace(self):
Possibly wrong (function name doesn't occur in doctests):
* _magma_init_(self, magma):
}}}
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12893>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
