#12841: update M4RIE to newest upstream release
-----------------------------------+----------------------------------------
       Reporter:  malb             |         Owner:  tbd         
           Type:  enhancement      |        Status:  needs_review
       Priority:  major            |     Milestone:  sage-5.1    
      Component:  packages         |    Resolution:              
       Keywords:                   |   Work issues:  autoheader  
Report Upstream:  N/A              |     Reviewers:              
        Authors:  Martin Albrecht  |     Merged in:              
   Dependencies:  #12840           |      Stopgaps:              
-----------------------------------+----------------------------------------

Comment (by SimonKing):

 Replying to [comment:24 malb]:
 > The bugfixes mainly concern the testsuite:

 I didn't install the package with SAGE_CHECK=yes, but I guess I should...
 Anyway, the Sage test suite (make ptestlong) works.

 I tried to verify your claim that it became faster for exponents between 4
 and 8. I tested 6. First, in vanilla sage-5.0.rc0:
 {{{
 sage: K.<z> = GF(2^6)
 sage: %time A = random_matrix(K,10000,10000)
 CPU times: user 1.63 s, sys: 0.06 s, total: 1.70 s
 Wall time: 1.70 s
 sage: %time B = random_matrix(K,10000,10000)
 CPU times: user 1.53 s, sys: 0.04 s, total: 1.58 s
 Wall time: 1.58 s
 sage: %time (A*B).rank()
 CPU times: user 85.03 s, sys: 0.12 s, total: 85.15 s
 Wall time: 85.40 s
 10000
 }}}
 With the new spkgs in sage-5.0.beta13:
 {{{
 sage: K.<z> = GF(2^6)
 sage: %time A = random_matrix(K,10000,10000)
 CPU times: user 1.77 s, sys: 0.07 s, total: 1.84 s
 Wall time: 1.85 s
 sage: %time B = random_matrix(K,10000,10000)
 CPU times: user 1.76 s, sys: 0.03 s, total: 1.79 s
 Wall time: 1.80 s
 sage: %time (A*B).rank()
 CPU times: user 37.38 s, sys: 0.23 s, total: 37.61 s
 Wall time: 37.74 s
 10000
 }}}

 Now, that ''is'' faster for the "real" computation, but roughly 10% slower
 for random matrix creation. Is that a random result within the margin of
 error?

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12841#comment:25>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to