#12883: Please consider updating to linbox 1.2.2
----------------------------------------------------------------+-----------
Reporter: pcpa |
Owner: cpernet
Type: enhancement |
Status: new
Priority: major |
Milestone: sage-wishlist
Component: linbox |
Resolution:
Keywords: | Work
issues:
Report Upstream: None of the above - read trac for reasoning. |
Reviewers:
Authors: | Merged
in:
Dependencies: |
Stopgaps:
----------------------------------------------------------------+-----------
Changes (by pcpa):
* milestone: sage-5.0 => sage-wishlist
Comment:
Is it reasonably to define mod_int to C long?
If not, safest approach should be to use uint32_t I believe, otherwise,
should require coding 64 bit templates in linbox 1.2.2.
The new attached fflas-ffpack-64bit.patch is required to generate proper
64 bit code, and the updated linbox-sagemath.patch should be very close to
the final format, but note that in 64 bit arch, linbox 1.2.2 with the
attached patches needs also to have -D!__LINBOX_HAVE_INT64=1 in CFLAGS and
CXXFLAGS.
I should update the sage-4.8-linbox.patch at some point, as the initial
patch I attached was only enough to get to another build failure in
Fedora. But the next update should be for sage-5.0.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12883#comment:5>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
