#12496: Improve doctest coverage for integer_ring.pyx
---------------------------------+------------------------------------------
Reporter: slelievre | Owner: slelievre
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-5.0
Component: documentation | Resolution:
Keywords: Cernay2012 | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Reviewers: Hugh Thomas
Authors: | Merged in:
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
---------------------------------+------------------------------------------
Comment (by JStarx):
A lot of functions are missing their input/output blocks, which should be
added if we're trying to improve the documentation. The functions
`random_element` and `completion` especially have input specifications but
aren't in the right form.
The conventions for documentation strings are
[http://www.sagemath.org/doc/developer/conventions.html#documentation-
strings here]. If you fix the two functions I mentioned (and feel free to
fix more than that :) ) I'll give the ticket a positive review.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12496#comment:8>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
