#12925: Thematic tutorial on combinatorics
--------------------------------------------------+-------------------------
Reporter: nthiery | Owner:
sage-combinat
Type: enhancement | Status:
needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-5.1
Component: combinatorics | Resolution:
Keywords: thematic tutorial | Work issues: move to
devel/sage/doc
Report Upstream: N/A | Reviewers: Hugh
Thomas, Nicolas M. Thiéry, Timothy Walsh
Authors: Nicolas M. Thiéry, Hugh Thomas | Merged in:
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
--------------------------------------------------+-------------------------
Changes (by nthiery):
* status: needs_work => needs_review
Comment:
Replying to [comment:17 jdemeyer]:
> Replying to [comment:16 jhpalmieri]:
> > I'm curious about why this is part of the reference manual, not the
thematic tutorials.
We have discussed this quite some with the Sage-Combinat people.
Here is the rationale for putting a thematic tutorial in the Sage
sources when there is a natural spot for it ("transversal" tutorials
should definitely go in the thematic tutorial directory):
- It's available from {{{sage: sage.combinat.tutorial?}}}
which I find a very desirable feature.
- It keeps it close to the related sources. Among the advantages are:
- a curious reader browsing the sources will find it
- running {{{sage -t}}} on sage.combinat will run the tests there
- grepping or query/replacing through sage/combinat will find it
- It's possible to refer to it from the reference manual (ok, that's a
bad argument: linking the thematic tutorials from the reference
manual ought to be possible, but this is another story).
Note that we already have a {{{sage.rings.padics.tutorial}}}.
Of course, this tutorial should be linked from the thematic tutorial
index. The reason I did not do it right away is that there is a patch
with other tutorials coming shortly which includes a bit of
reorganization of the that index, and I wanted to avoid trivial
conflicts.
What do you think?
I am putting this back to needs review, and let you put it back to
positive review.
Cheers,
Nicolas
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12925#comment:18>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
